The HED Task Catalog is under development. IDs are not stable until formal release. Comments are welcome at github.com/hed-standard/hed-task/issues.

Mismatch Negativity Task

HED task ID: hedtsk_mismatch_negativity

Family: Oddball, vigilance and continuous performance tasks

Also known as: MMN, Mismatch Negativity Paradigm, Mismatch Negativity

Passive auditory oddball in which rare deviant sounds elicit a negative ERP around 150–250 ms, indexing pre-attentive auditory change detection.

Description

Participants are passively exposed to repetitive acoustic stimuli (standard tones, 80%) occasionally interrupted by deviant tones (20%) differing in pitch, duration, or location. The MMN can be elicited without active attention. Recorded via EEG, the MMN appears as a negative deflection peaking at 100-250 ms after deviance onset at frontocentral sites. It reflects automatic, pre-attentive comparison between incoming input and a neural representation of the standard stimulus stored in sensory (echoic) memory. MMN is used as a biomarker of auditory processing capacity and has clinical applications in schizophrenia, coma prognosis, and language development research.

Inclusion test

An experiment is an instance of this task when its procedure matches, it manipulates at least one of the listed variables, and it records at least one of the listed measures.

Procedure

A repetitive standard tone is occasionally replaced by a deviant tone differing in frequency, duration, or intensity. Participants typically ignore the sounds while reading or watching a silent video.

Manipulation

Deviant type (frequency, duration, intensity, phoneme); deviant probability; magnitude of deviance; ISI.

Measurement

MMN amplitude and latency (deviant-minus-standard difference wave, peaking 100–250 ms); scalp topography.

Variations

Named versions that change what the participant experiences or does. The identifier of a variation is hedvar_<task>__<variation>.

Variation

Description

Justification

Frequency MMN

hedvar_mismatch_negativity__frequency_mmn

Deviant tone frequency differs from standard.

Frequency deviant in auditory stream; canonical MMN stimulus type

Duration MMN

hedvar_mismatch_negativity__duration_mmn

Deviant tone duration differs from standard.

Duration deviant; different acoustic dimension

Intensity MMN

hedvar_mismatch_negativity__intensity_mmn

Deviant tone intensity differs from standard.

Intensity deviant; tests loudness change detection

Location/Spatial MMN

hedvar_mismatch_negativity__location_spatial_mmn

Deviant sound location differs from standard.

Spatial location change; different perceptual dimension

Complex Pattern MMN

hedvar_mismatch_negativity__complex_pattern_mmn

Rule-violation deviants in patterned sequences.

Pattern-level violation; higher-order regularity processing

Multi-Feature MMN (Optimum)

hedvar_mismatch_negativity__multi_feature_mmn_optimum

Multiple deviant types within single paradigm; efficient clinical protocol.

Multiple deviants in single paradigm; different stimulus sequence

Phoneme/Speech MMN

hedvar_mismatch_negativity__phoneme_speech_mmn

Vowel, consonant, or syllable deviants; language-specific processing.

Phonemic contrast as deviant; linguistic processing

Visual MMN (vMMN)

hedvar_mismatch_negativity__visual_mmn_vmmn

Deviant visual stimuli in sequences; tests predictive coding in vision.

Visual change detection; different sensory modality

Roving Standard MMN

hedvar_mismatch_negativity__roving_standard_mmn

Standard identity changes after train of repetitions; connects to repetition suppression.

Standard changes after each sequence; different stimulus history structure

Cognitive processes

This task is designed to engage the following processes:

Key references

  • Naatanen, R., Gaillard, A. W. K., & Mantysalo, S. (1978). Early selective-attention effect on evoked potential reinterpreted. Acta Psychologica, 42(4), 313-329. (DOI, PubMed)

  • Naatanen, R., Paavilainen, P., Rinne, T., & Alho, K. (2007). The mismatch negativity (MMN) in basic research of central auditory processing: A review. Clinical Neurophysiology, 118(12), 2544-2590. (DOI, PubMed)

  • Garrido, M. I., Kilner, J. M., Stephan, K. E., & Friston, K. J. (2009). The mismatch negativity: A review of underlying mechanisms. Clinical Neurophysiology, 120(3), 453-463. (DOI, PubMed)

Further references

  • Näätänen, R., Kujala, T., & Winkler, I. (2011). Auditory processing that leads to conscious perception: A unique window to central auditory processing opened by the mismatch negativity and related responses. Psychophysiology, 48(1), 4–22. (DOI)

  • Erickson, M. A., Ruffle, A., & Gold, J. M. (2016). A meta-analysis of mismatch negativity in schizophrenia: From clinical risk to disease specificity and progression. Biological Psychiatry, 79(12), 980–987. (DOI, PubMed)

  • Wacongne, C., Labyt, E., van Wassenhove, V., Bekinschtein, T., Naccache, L., & Dehaene, S. (2011). Evidence for a hierarchy of predictions and prediction errors in the human cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(51), 20754–20759. (DOI, PubMed)